Дизaйн, DFT, дoкинг и in silico aнaлиз aцильных прoизвoдных aлкaлoидoв кaк пoтeнциaльных ингибитoрoв oснoвнoй прoтeaзы SARS-CоV-2 M^pro

Выпoлнeны квaнтoвo-химирчeскиe рaсчeты с примeнeниeм мeтoдa тeoрии фyнкциoнaлa плoтнoсти (DFT) для исслeдoвaния мoлeкyлярнoй стрyктyры aцилпрoизвoдных aнaбaзинa, цитизинa и хининoвых aлкaлoидoв с примeнeниeм yрoвня тeoрии CAM-B3LYP/MidiX. Были вычислeны индeксы квaнтoвых мoлeкyлярных дeскриптoрoв этих сoeдинeний, тaких кaк пoтeнциaл иoнизaции (IP) и срoдствo к элeктрoнy (EA), твeрдoсть (η), мягкoсть (S), элeктрooтрицaтeльнoсть (μ), элeктрoфильный индeкс (ω), элeктрoнoдoнoрнaя спoсoбнoсть (ω^–), элeктрoнoприeмнaя спoсoбнoсть (ω⁺) и энeргeтичeскaя щeль (E_g). Исслeдoвaны фaрмaкoкинeтичeскиe свoйствa нaзвaнных сoeдинeний и их биoлoгичeскaя aктивнoсть, прoвeдeнo исслeдoвaниe мoлeкyлярнoгo дoкингa для выявлeния нaибoлee эффeктивнoгo сoeдинeния, кoтoрoe мoжeт дeйствoвaть кaк сильный ингибитoр oснoвнoй прoтeaзы M^pro SARS-CoV-2. Энeргия связи мeждy oснoвнoй прoтeaзoй SARS-CoV-2 M^pro и прoизвoдными прирoдных aлкaлoидoв пoкaзaлa хoрoшee срoдствo связывaния. Тaким oбрaзoм, изyчeнныe прoизвoдныe прирoдных aлкaлoидoв мoгyт быть испoльзoвaны для пoтeнциaльнoгo примeнeния прoтив oснoвнoй прoтeaзы M^pro SARS-CoV-2.

1. Sepay N., Sekar A., Halder U.C., Alarifi A., Afzal M. Anti-COVID-19 terpenoid from marine sources: A docking, admet and molecular dynamics study. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2021, vol. 1228, art. 129433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129433

2. Gioia M., Ciaccio C., Calligari P., De Simone G., Sbardella D., Tundo G., Francesco, Fasciglione G., Di Masi A., Di Pierro D., Bocedi A., Ascenzi P., Coletta M. Role of proteolytic enzymes in the COVID-19 infection and promising therapeutic approaches. Biochemical Pharmacology, 2020, vol. 182, art. 114225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114225

3. Zhu H., Wei L., Niu P. The novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Global health research and policy, 2020, vol. 5, art. no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00135-6

4. Choudhary J., Dheeman S., Sharma V., Katiyar P., Karn S. K., Sarangi M. K., Chauhan A. K., Verma G., Baliyan N. Insights of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a current review. Biological procedures online, 2021, vol. 23, art. no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-020-00141-5

5. da Silva S., Jefferson R., Silva C. T. A., Guarines K. M., Mendes R. P. G., Pardee K., Kohl A., Pena L. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19. ACS Infectious Diseases, 2020, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2319–2336. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00274

6. Marinho E. M., de Andrade Neto J. B., Silva J., da Silva C. R., Cavalcanti B. C., Marinho E. S., Junior H. V. N. Virtual screening based on molecular docking of possible inhibitors of Covid-19 main protease. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2020, vol. 148, art. no. 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104365

7. Osipiuk J., Azizi S. A., Dvorkin S., Endres M., Jedrzejczak R., Jones K. A., Kang S., Kathayat R. S., Kim Y., Lisnyak V. G. Structure of papain-like protease from SARS-CoV-2 and its complexes with non-covalent inhibitors. Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104365

8. Wang H., He S., Deng W., Zhang Y., Li G., Sun J., Zhao W., Yu G., Yin Z., Li D. Comprehensive insights into the catalytic mechanism of middle east respiratory syndrome 3C-Like protease and severe acute respiratory syndrome 3C-Like protease. ACS Catalysis, 2020, vol. 10, pp. 5871–5890. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c00110

9. Amin S. A., Banerjee S., Ghosh K., Gayen S., Jha T. Protease targeted COVID-19 drug discovery and its challenges: Insight into viral main protease (Mpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibitors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2020, vol. 29, art. no. 115860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115860

10. Jin Z., Zhaom Y., Sun Y., Zhang B., Wang H., Wu Y., Zhu Y., Zhu C., Hu T., Du X. Structural basis for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by antineoplastic drug carmofur. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2020, vol. 27, pp. 529–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0440-6

11. Zhang L., Lin D, Sun X., Curth U., Drosten C., Sauerhering L., Becker S., Rox K., Hilgenfeld R. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors. Science, 2020, vol. 368, pp. 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3405

12. Rasool N., Akhtar A., Hussain W. Insights into the inhibitory potential of selective phytochemicals against Mpro of 2019-nCoV: a computer-aided study. Structural Chemistry, 2020, vol. 31, pp. 1777–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01536-6

13. Shahab S., Sheikhi M., Alnajjar R., Al Saud S., Khancheuski M., Strogova A. DFT investigation of atazanavir as potential inhibitor for 2019-nCoV coronavirus M protease. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2020, vol. 1228, art. no. 129461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129461

14. Agamah F. E., Mazandu G. K., Hassan R., Bope C. D., Thomford N. E, Ghansah A., Chimusa E. R. Computational/in silico methods in drug target and lead prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2020, vol. 21, pp. 1663–1675. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bib/bbz103

15. Rognan D. The impact of in silico screening in the discovery of novel and safer drug candidate. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2017, vol. 175, pp. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.034

16. Sachdev K., Gupta M. K. A comprehensive review of feature based methods for drug target interaction prediction.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019, vol. 93, art. no. 103159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103159

17. Lipinski C. A., Lombardo F., Dominy B. W., Feeney P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1997, vol. 23, pp. 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1

18. Husain A., Ahmad A., Khan S. A., Asif M., Bhutani R., Al-Abbasi F. A. Synthesis, molecular properties, toxicity and biological evaluation of some new substituted imidazolidine derivatives in search of potent anti-inflammatory agents. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 2016, vol. 24, pp. 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.008

19. Yanai T., Tew D. P., Handy N. C. A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chemical Physics Letters, 2004, vol. 393, pp. 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011

20. Lynch B. J., Truhlar D. G. Small basis sets for calculations of barrier heights, energies of reaction, electron affinities, geometries, and dipole moments. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2004, vol. 111, pp. 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-003-0518-3

21. Bitzer M., Schaeffel F. Effects of quisqualic acid on retinal ZENK expression induced by imposed defocus in the chick eye. Optometry and Vision Science, 2004, vol. 81, pp. 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200402000-00011

22. Amati M., Stoia S., Baerends E. J. The Electron Affinity as the Highest Occupied Anion Orbital Energy with a Sufficiently Accurate Approximation of the Exact Kohn–Sham Potential. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2019, vol. 16, pp. 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00981

23. Shahab S., Sheikhi M. Antioxidant Properties of the Phorbol: A DFT Approach. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2020, vol. 14, pp. 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793120010145

24. Trott O., Olson A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2009, vol. 31, pp. 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334

25. Mukusheva G. K., Zhasymbekova A. R., Seidakhmetova R. B., Nurkenov O. A., Akishina E. A., Petkevich S. K., Dikusar E. A., Potkin V. I. Quinine Esters with 1,2-Azole, Pyridine and Adamantane Fragments. Molecules, 2022, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 3476. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113476

26. Mukusheva G. K., Zhasymbekova A. R., Zhumagalieva Z. Z., Seidakhmetova R. B., Nurkenov O. A., Akishina E. A., Petkevich S. K., Dikusar E. A., Potkin V. I. Synthesis and Biological Activity of N-acyl Anabasine and Cytisine Derivatives with Adamantane, Pyridine and 1,2-Azole Fragments. Molecules, 2022, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 7387. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217387

27. Sheikhi M., Shahab S., Khaleghian M., Hajikolaee F. H., Balakhanava I., Alnajjar R. Adsorption properties of the molecule resveratrol on CNT (8, 0-10) nanotube: geometry optimization, molecular structure, spectroscopic (NMR, UV/Vis, excited state), FMO, MEP and HOMO-LUMO investigations. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2018, vol. 1160, pp. 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.01.005

28. Shahab S., Sheikhi M., Filippovich L., Dikusar E., Yahyaei H. Quantum chemical modeling of new derivatives of (E, E)-azomethines: synthesis, spectroscopic (FT-IR, UV/Vis, polarization) and thermophysical investigations. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2017, vol. 1137, pp. 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.02.056

29. Shahab S., Sheikhi M., Filippovich L., Alnajjar R., Ihnatovich Z., Laznev K., Strogova A., Atroshko M., Drachilovskaya M. Quantum-chemical modeling, spectroscopic (FT-IR, excited states, UV/Vis, polarization, and Dichroism) studies of two new benzo [d] oxazole derivatives. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2020, vol. 1202, art. no. 127352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127352